JakeSCH
Well-Known Member
Well animal activist are at it again trying to ban the following:
Iconic African species means any species or subspecies of the following members of the animal kingdom: African elephant (Loxodonta africana and Loxodonta cyclotis), African lion (Panthera leo), leopard (Panthera pardus), black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis), white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum), giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis), Jentink’s duiker (Cephalophus jentinki), plains zebra (Equus quagga), mountain zebra (Equus zebra), hippopotamus (Hippopotamus amphibius), and striped hyena (Hyaena hyaena), this includes any part, product, or the dead body or parts thereof, excluding fossils, whether or not included in a manufactured product or in a food product of any species protected by this part.
Now while I do not have a desire to hunt any of these currently, it should not be up to California to prevent us from importing any legally hunted animals. The bill is an animal activists (New Jersey cat lady's) attempt to end hunting on animals that they see as superior because of childrens books.
We cannot allow them to win this / cite precedence for future limitations on hunting.
Please take 5 minutes to tell Gov. Brown that you disagree. https://govapps.gov.ca.gov/gov39mail/
Thanks,
Jake
Iconic African species means any species or subspecies of the following members of the animal kingdom: African elephant (Loxodonta africana and Loxodonta cyclotis), African lion (Panthera leo), leopard (Panthera pardus), black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis), white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum), giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis), Jentink’s duiker (Cephalophus jentinki), plains zebra (Equus quagga), mountain zebra (Equus zebra), hippopotamus (Hippopotamus amphibius), and striped hyena (Hyaena hyaena), this includes any part, product, or the dead body or parts thereof, excluding fossils, whether or not included in a manufactured product or in a food product of any species protected by this part.
Now while I do not have a desire to hunt any of these currently, it should not be up to California to prevent us from importing any legally hunted animals. The bill is an animal activists (New Jersey cat lady's) attempt to end hunting on animals that they see as superior because of childrens books.
We cannot allow them to win this / cite precedence for future limitations on hunting.
Please take 5 minutes to tell Gov. Brown that you disagree. https://govapps.gov.ca.gov/gov39mail/
Thanks,
Jake
