Just when you thought it was safe to go back into the ocean

invisible man

Walk The Line
Oct 7, 2011
1,681
290
83
About 20 feet up
A huge 9-foot-long great white shark was eaten by an even bigger “mystery sea monster,” according to scientists.

Researchers had tagged the healthy shark to track its movements as part of a study, but were shocked when the tracking device washed up on a beach in Australia four months later.

Data captured on the device showed there was a rapid temperature rise from 46 degrees to 78 degrees Fahrenheit along with a sudden, sharp 1,902-foot plunge.

The researchers believe the data proves it was eaten by something much bigger, saying the temperatures recorded indicate that the shark went inside another animal’s digestive system.

The only theory they have so far is that that shark was gobbled up by a “colossal cannibal great white shark.”

The case is detailed in an upcoming documentary by the Smithsonian Institute, called the “Hunt for the Super Predator,” which draws from an earlier Australian documentary, “The Search for the Ocean’s Super Predator.”

“When I was first told about the data that came back from the tag that was on the shark, I was absolutely blown away,” filmmaker Dave Riggs says in the documentary.

“The question that not only came to my mind but everyone’s mind who was involved was, ‘What did that?’ It was obviously eaten. What’s gonna eat a shark that big? What could kill a [9-foot] great white?”
 
I know orcas have killed great whites but I don't think they eat them.
 
If the shark plunged to deep depths and the temperature readout on the tag jumped 20+ degrees, what cold blooded animal would be rocking 80 degree internals at over 2,000 feet below the surface?!?! I'm no scientist, but cold blooded animals will have relative temperatures to their surroundings. Sounds like maybe it was a bad tag...
 
8SteelTown said:
If the shark plunged to deep depths and the temperature readout on the tag jumped 20+ degrees, what cold blooded animal would be rocking 80 degree internals at over 2,000 feet below the surface?!?! I'm no scientist, but cold blooded animals will have relative temperatures to their surroundings. Sounds like maybe it was a bad tag...

www.sharkwatchsa.com/en/blog/category/482/post/987/shark-fact-29-02-2012/

Not exactly cold blooded. They are warmer then what's going on around them I think
 
Sdbirds said:
8SteelTown said:
If the shark plunged to deep depths and the temperature readout on the tag jumped 20+ degrees, what cold blooded animal would be rocking 80 degree internals at over 2,000 feet below the surface?!?! I'm no scientist, but cold blooded animals will have relative temperatures to their surroundings. Sounds like maybe it was a bad tag...

www.sharkwatchsa.com/en/blog/category/482/post/987/shark-fact-29-02-2012/

Not exactly cold blooded. They are warmer then what's going on around them I think

Look at you... Johnny on the spot!
 

About us

  • SCHoutdoors was created in January of 2011 by a few people who love the outdoors. The main goal is still the same – bring people together who enjoy the outdoors and share their knowledge and experience.
    Outdoors in the West, Hunting gear reviews, Big Game, Small Game, Upland Game, Waterfowl, Varmint, Bow Hunting, long Range Rifles, Reloading, Taxidermy, Salt WaterFishing, Freshwater Fishing, Buy-Sell-Trade on Classifieds and Cooking/Recipes
    All things outdoors…come join us, learn, contribute and become part of the SCHoutdoors community.

Quick Navigation

User Menu