president Trump's addresses the un

[longbowhunter2]

Has any one seen his address to the UN?
I did this morning on you tube.
I basically liked what I heard.
What is your thoughts. My conservative friends.
If you have not, it's must to watch.
Search on you tube before it's taken down.
I don't normally like posting political, but want you all to hear it.
Best
Longbow

 

[Smokey58]

Only highlights but its great to hear the Prez tell the world that the US will not be governed by the UN and that only friendly nations will get our financial aid. About time we tightened up the ingrates that take us for fools and for granted.

 

[stikbrandon]

Lovin it

 

[longbowhunter2]

Yep that's the jest of it. In addition
Some countries got stern warnings

 

[msailor]

Liked what I heard too.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[ilovesprig]

I'm in Montana.....So everything he said was perfect per the folks up here…...lol

.

 

[Muledeerhunter]

What Trump says is true, and we all know it.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

[longbowhunter2]

I truly believe Trump address to the UN is one of these moments in history. I need to listen to his speech
Several times to really let it sink in.
I believe it will be a moment like JFK
Before him.
If the USA signed that UN treaty
According to the UN agenda 21
Every citizen would have to be disarmed and the UN would be allowed to use UN troops to use force in the USA.

President Obama signed that treaty
But Congress did not ratify it.
Thank to God.
Trump is going against the big boys.
Banking system, the dollar for oil.
BS trade with other countries.
Warning Iran of war, telling OPEC
Charging to much for oil. Monopoly.
And no more free rides. Paying bribes of millions of dollars to other countries.
These are bold moves, and will endanger his life.
My thoughts
Longbow

 

[Smokey58]

LongBow: couldn't agree you more.... Today, the Prez declared that China tried to influence the elections because Trump is bad for business (theirs).
The Europeans despise us but covet our money and military protection. Whenever anything bad happens around the world, everyone looks to the US for leadership and help but the world powers are still envious of us. I think this shake-up is good and over due both on the national and international fronts but the "bad guys" aren't going to lay down and accept it, theres going to be resistance and maybe more. Just mah two cents...

 

[Ramshackle]

According to the UN agenda 21
Every citizen would have to be disarmed and the UN would be allowed to use UN troops to use force in the USA.

President Obama signed that treaty
But Congress did not ratify it.
Thank to God.

Little fact check here:

Agenda 21 is a voluntary action plan that offers suggestions for sustainable ways local, state and national governments can combat poverty and pollution and conserve natural resources in the 21st century. 178 governments—including the U.S. led by then-President George H.W. Bush—voted to adopt the program which is, again, not legally binding in any way, at the 1992 U.N. Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro.

 

[longbowhunter2]

Little fact check here:

Hi Ramshackle

I did research on the above and from some reading from people a little smarter than my self.
And their analysis stated it was not
Voluntary. But people can be wrong or can twist the facts.
Do you have data on what you stated.
Best
LB

 

[longbowhunter2]

The ageda is written so it can be interpreted in many ways.
Part of is to prevent Access to public land. Thus locked gates.
Any nation citizens are prohibited to own arms. If this is not done voluntary. Then the UN has the right
Inforcemen physical removal of small arms by the UN.

This will be my last post on subject.
Best
LB

 

[Ramshackle]

Hi Ramshackle

I did research on the above and from some reading from people a little smarter than my self.
And their analysis stated it was not
Voluntary. But people can be wrong or can twist the facts.
Do you have data on what you stated.
Best
LB

Agreed on the point that people on any side of an argument can be wrong and will certainly twist facts to suit their narrative.

Not that I expect anyone (including myself) to read it, but here's the full text of the original Agenda 21.

RE: Public lands, my opinion is that the original intent was to prevent damaging extractive industry from destroying air, land and water and potentially harming human and wild-life in the process. Remember that the large scope of this is with the 3rd world in mind where such practices are rampant and human life is cheap.

RE: Firearms, I couldn't find anything in the actual text to support this, but I concede that I'm not an expert. The only sources I found for this were, again, in my opinion, fearmongering conspiracy sites with an agenda to push. Let's pretend it's 100% true... The UN doesn't have the balls to invade the US and forcibly disarm its citizenry, and if they did the result would be devastating... Even worse than if the US decided to do it itself.

 

[rbduffer]

I don't know crap about Agenda 2. Because it's written only for Lawyers to 'interpret'.
But NOTHING is worse than if the US citizenry 'decided' to disarm itself.

 

[Ramshackle]

I don't know crap about Agenda 2. Because it's written only for Lawyers to 'interpret'.
But NOTHING is worse than if the US citizenry 'decided' to disarm itself.

I meant worse for them (UN) in terms of loss of life.

 

[longbowhunter2]

I agree , but notice how hard the communist socialist are trying to
Kill our 2nd amendment.
Surely we can agree this is part of their long term goal.
Kind of backs up what I am saying.
Just look at the writing on the wall.
And use common sense.
It's their goal.
Enough said let's go hunting.
It's good to discuss it.
LB

 

[Ramshackle]

I agree , but notice how hard the communist socialist are trying to
Enough said let's go hunting.
It's good to discuss it.

Counting the minutes till I hit the road for Idaho mule deer in Oct... Also doing a ton of research trying to get an axis deer hunt in during an anniversary trip to Hawaii early next year.