I think we are, for the most part, saying the same thing. I am just looking at the new bullet designs penetration and wound channels data as comparable to larger cartridges; along with selecting a thin walled appropriate led bullet providing simular results; if that is a potential choice, i,e...
A poorly placed shots with a big caliber provides zero forgiveness over an appropriate smaller caliber bullet. Granted. This is Ca, and choices are limited by state regulations. But, the bullet choice for varying common calibers is basically the same.
The disadvantage we have in Ca is...
A 6.5 CM paired with the right bullet has taken plenty of elk, it's more than capable; given appropriate shot placement. It's the wound channel that kills animals, not caliber. But, a 6.5 CM does limit the distance at which you can reliably kill. I have nothing against larger calibers, and I own...
NewScum, i.e., California cannot regulate the federal government, from a legal perspective. Thus, this was just to make an unenforceable statement. Otherwise it is pointless
I read somewhere, that those disgusting things have diseases that can transfer just from proximity. Touching is pretty much a guarantee. After about a month you start to look like them increasing with time. If I were you, I'd suit up in hazmat gear.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.