So, if a LEO is ID'ed and he is attacked , injured, killed, or his home vandalized should Ca. legislators and Gruesome be held accountable. I 110% believe they should be.
Because, as in the past, they have been identified, then someone found out who they were and where they lived and caused them problems, Harassed them and their families. It's just that simple. Would yo like to have your family bothered because you were your job.Why do cops need to wear masks? If they're UC, that's one thing, but if they're in full uniform acting in a LEO capacity, and they refuse to identify themselves, that's extremely sketchy. Accountability ensures quality service in all professions, especially those who get to carry a gun and detain people with near complete impunity.
It’s also naive to think this has anything to do with any “cops” other than ICE.Because, as in the past, they have been identified, then someone found out who they were and where they lived and caused them problems, Harassed them and their families. It's just that simple. Would yo like to have your family bothered because you were your job.
See now we're in the territory of regulating "pre crime." Allowing cops to cover their faces because someone might dox them is a slippery slope. If you're a public servant with a public salary paid by taxpayers, and you don't do your job honorably, then that should be known who's responsible. I can't wear a mask at my job so customers can't complain about me. I just have to act in a way that won't give someone a reason to get pissed.Because, as in the past, they have been identified, then someone found out who they were and where they lived and caused them problems, Harassed them and their families. It's just that simple. Would yo like to have your family bothered because you were your job.
Your arguments hold no water what so ever. You are comparing your desk job to LEO's out here putting their lives on the line. So maybe one in one hundred is not doing his or her job honorably, as you put it, you feel is is just fine to jeopardize all others officers. Maybe there is a spot on the View for you, I think you would fit in just fine.See now we're in the territory of regulating "pre crime." Allowing cops to cover their faces because someone might dox them is a slippery slope. If you're a public servant with a public salary paid by taxpayers, and you don't do your job honorably, then that should be known who's responsible. I can't wear a mask at my job so customers can't complain about me. I just have to act in a way that won't give someone a reason to get pissed.
Charlie would be OK with that. This world would be alot better if more people were like Charlie and Erika.I would say we have a 'Democrat" in this thread!
Yeah, Antifa and the rest of the criminals can continue to wear masks, only LEOs are targeted (no pun intended) with this. As with just about anything democrats do, they want a result, and they don't care what it takes to get there or who it might hurt or if it's even possible. They remind me of a 3-year-old in Walmart's toy section. They want that certain toy, and they don't care how momma and dada (us) get it for them, or if we can afford it, or who we have to hurt to get it. And if they don't get it, the tantrums begin. BTW - at least he thought ahead just a little on this one because he specifically exempted the CA Highway Patrol (CHP), which, surprise, surprise, happens to be the agency that guards him.Does this mean antifa masks wearers will be prosecuted? Or is he just targeting his own police force like a dummy? Seems like a backward ass way of retaliation towards feds,backfired. Wuta lame.
Pointless, same as Libs.NewScum, i.e., California cannot regulate the federal government, from a legal perspective. Thus, this was just to make an unenforceable statement. Otherwise it is pointless