The defining characteristics for legality per the regs are fork-n-horn for D16 and antlerless for G13. Not necessarily a male/female thing (G13 is not limited to does; I believe you could shoot a button buck if under 3" spikes). Keep the head and consult the regs first before pulling the trigger..Yup. Read this but does the head of a deer alone justify proof of sex? The reason I ask is I've read that a lot of hunter leave a testicle attached to meat on bucks as proof. Does the same thought process apply w/ Doe's and leaving a sex organ attached?
Thanks for the info. I'm aware of the G13 regs but my question is specific to a doe. I just can't seem to find any info about leaving proof of sex for a female. My plan is to field dress the animal (if successful) and pack out the meat and the only info I could find, as far as leaving proof of sex attached, was leaving the vulva or udder. I think I will call F&G tomorrow before I go out again just for some clarity.The defining characteristics for legality per the regs are fork-n-horn for D16 and antlerless for G13. Not necessarily a male/female thing (G13 is not limited to does; I believe you could shoot a button buck if under 3" spikes). Keep the head and consult the regs first before pulling the trigger..
There is no requirement for proving the animal's sex.. what I was trying to say is the only requirement is to prove that your deer fits the legal definition of a D16 or G13 (or M6, A22, etc.) which the head will do the trick. E.g., showing a buck's gonads won't tell you whether that buck was a forked horn buck and, likewise, a doe's udders won't tell you whether that deer was truly an "antlerless" deer per the regs. We don't have "buck" or "doe" tags here like other states do, probably since CA doesn't want to hurt the deer's feelings if it identifies as an antlered doe or something..Thanks for the info. I'm aware of the G13 regs but my question is specific to a doe. I just can't seem to find any info about leaving proof of sex for a female. My plan is to field dress the animal (if successful) and pack out the meat and the only info I could find, as far as leaving proof of sex attached, was leaving the vulva or udder. I think I will call F&G tomorrow before I go out again just for some clarity.
Fantastic! Thanks for clearing this up for me man!There is no requirement for proving the animal's sex.. what I was trying to say is the only requirement is to prove that your deer fits the legal definition of a D16 or G13 (or M6, A22, etc.) which the head will do the trick. E.g., showing a buck's gonads won't tell you whether that buck was a forked horn buck and, likewise, a doe's udders won't tell you whether that deer was truly an "antlerless" deer per the regs. We don't have "buck" or "doe" tags here like other states do, probably since CA doesn't want to hurt the deer's feelings if it identifies as an antlered doe or something..
In California it does, if I remember the regs correctly.Yup. Read this but does the head of a deer alone justify proof of sex? The reason I ask is I've read that a lot of hunter leave a testicle attached to meat on bucks as proof. Does the same thought process apply w/ Doe's and leaving a sex organ attached?
Nope, not meDo you have an IG account as Socalhuntr ?
Yup. Read this but does the head of a deer alone justify proof of sex? The reason I ask is I've read that a lot of hunter leave a testicle attached to meat on bucks as proof. Does the same thought process apply w/ Doe's and leaving a sex organ attached?
Thanks for giving me the heads up and looking out on the head retention. That rule could be easily overlooked.Looks like you already got your answer, but in short, yes the head proves whether your deer was antlered or not (less than 3" spikes for antlerless) but I also posted the regs because a lot of people don't know that you have to keep the head. I know someone that received a citation for not following this...