Chris_Schulte said:Even if you don't like trump we all know you don't like Hillary. So vote trump!!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
TonyS said:From yesterday:
"There is no drought in California" DONALD TRUMP
Yeah, let's get his finger on the button!
TRUMP!
We get it. You are most likely a democrat. You don't like Trump. Fine.TonyS said:Even 'Archer' Paul Ryan says 'textbook racism'. Go Trump!
nicapopolis said:TonyS said:From yesterday:
"There is no drought in California" DONALD TRUMP
Yeah, let's get his finger on the button!
TRUMP!
We get it. You are most likely a democrat. You don't like Trump. Fine.TonyS said:Even 'Archer' Paul Ryan says 'textbook racism'. Go Trump!
You are an anomaly in the hunting world, we get it.
The media spins both sides we all know that.
You cannot for one second believe Hillary is any better for America though. Utterly impossible.
Hunting and my rights as a firearm owner are too important to me to ever vote for Hillary. The fact that Democrats could at some point make it illegal to pass down my firearms to my children scares the crap out of me. The legislation just keeps popping up and they all have a D next to them.
The fact that these parties have gotten so far apart ruins it for all of us as Americans, democrat or republican.
Vote for the best option (unfortunately) regardless of your stupid party.... and that goes for everyone, democrat or republican.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
GSPman said:I fear one thing. The Electoral College. I honestly believe that if 100% of Americans voted for trump he would not be president. The system is so corrupt at this point that the self proclaimed "nobility" (American politicians) will never allow any one but the one person they already have groomed to "win". I believe they honestly don't care what the peasants want.
HOWEVER GET OUT AND VOTE ANYWAY!!! FOR TRUMP. the best option
We could all just do a write in vote STEVE ilovespring
GSPman said:I fear one thing. The Electoral College. I honestly believe that if 100% of Americans voted for trump he would not be president. The system is so corrupt at this point that the self proclaimed "nobility" (American politicians) will never allow any one but the one person they already have groomed to "win". I believe they honestly don't care what the peasants want.
HOWEVER GET OUT AND VOTE ANYWAY!!! FOR TRUMP. the best option
We could all just do a write in vote STEVE ilovespring
Aeon said:You fear the ec for what reason?
Might want to rethink that, densely populated urban centers do not have my values at heart. In a pure popular vote you could see the end to county values.
As a fyi faithless electors have never changed a race.
Kellendv said:Aeon said:You fear the ec for what reason?
Might want to rethink that, densely populated urban centers do not have my values at heart. In a pure popular vote you could see the end to county values.
As a fyi faithless electors have never changed a race.
Right but at the end of the day, if more individual people vote for one over another, that person should be declared the victor. Period. Has nothing to do with densely populated urban areas.
^ this.
Macsteve said:Kellendv said:Aeon said:You fear the ec for what reason?
Might want to rethink that, densely populated urban centers do not have my values at heart. In a pure popular vote you could see the end to county values.
As a fyi faithless electors have never changed a race.
Right but at the end of the day, if more individual people vote for one over another, that person should be declared the victor. Period. Has nothing to do with densely populated urban areas.
^ this.
Michael951 said:Macsteve said:Kellendv said:Aeon said:You fear the ec for what reason?
Might want to rethink that, densely populated urban centers do not have my values at heart. In a pure popular vote you could see the end to county values.
As a fyi faithless electors have never changed a race.
Right but at the end of the day, if more individual people vote for one over another, that person should be declared the victor. Period. Has nothing to do with densely populated urban areas.
^ this.
I totally disagree with your statement:
"Right but at the end of the day, if more individual people vote for one over another, that person should be declared the victor. Period. Has nothing to do with densely populated urban areas."
It has everything to do with how different areas and types of areas feel and want to live. JMO
Macsteve said:Michael951 said:Macsteve said:Kellendv said:Aeon said:You fear the ec for what reason?
Might want to rethink that, densely populated urban centers do not have my values at heart. In a pure popular vote you could see the end to county values.
As a fyi faithless electors have never changed a race.
Right but at the end of the day, if more individual people vote for one over another, that person should be declared the victor. Period. Has nothing to do with densely populated urban areas.
^ this.
I totally disagree with your statement:
"Right but at the end of the day, if more individual people vote for one over another, that person should be declared the victor. Period. Has nothing to do with densely populated urban areas."
It has everything to do with how different areas and types of areas feel and want to live. JMO
So you're saying that different classes of people should be segregated based on a point system and those who fall into the lower lifestyle should be given less points per person since they would like to have their representation different? and those "Others" should be given more points because there are less of them