Personally, people bragging about their hunting skill doesn't bother me too much. If I get or don't get my critter(s) (no matter if it's dove to deer) I'm happy because, I'm out in the field, marsh, forest, desert hunting my way. I think, as hunters, we need to stick together and not give the antis a "chink in the armor" to get through when they're trying to divide and conquer. Just because you wouldn't hunt a High Fence doesn't mean you should criticize those that do. Some might have physical limitations that make High Fence their only real option to possible harvesting some game. And how big does a property have to be to be High Fence? 10 acres? 100 Acres? 640 acres (aka 1 sq. mile)? wackums back's 5900 acres? I once hunted a 640 acre "ranch" (not the one in Riverside county) for pigs (I won the hunt in a contest). It was a low fenced property, meaning the pigs, that couldn't jump the fence, were contained on the property. Deer could come and go because they could jump the low fence. Pigs were brought into the property and stocked every once in a while. My understanding is they were wild pigs trapped on other ranches and brought in. Every pig I saw, and the pictures I saw of others harvested there, appeared to be wild boar, not feral pigs. They acted as "wild" as other pigs I have hunted on "opened" ranches. It took my son and I two days to harvest our pigs and we did it at the last minute as we were pulling up to the gate to leave empty handed and stumbled across a couple pigs walking down the fence line. Would you consider that a "high fence"? would you criticize us for hunting it? Would I do it again? Maybe? Still undecided, it was more challenging then I though it would be and I initially wouldn't have gone there, but like I said, I won the hunt so it was free. I definitely wouldn't go to this particular ranch again as they lost their lease and are no longer in operation.